Introduction and Precursor # 1
Before we can use critical thinking skills to solve problems
or make decisions, there are, I believe, some ordinary, everyday skills that we need to
have more fully developed. In my mind, we need to observe more fully, organize more
efficiently, and follow through more creatively if we want to more effectively use our
higher thinking skills.
- Observation: If we aren't fully aware of all of the
data that constantly bombards us, we will be attempting to solve problems or make
decisions without potentially-essential data. We don't play card games with missing cards,
yet we frequently try to solve problems or make decisions with partial information. That
frequently leads to inadequate and frustrating outcomes.
- Organization: Once we are observing more completely, we
might still be inefficient if we haven't organized the data into some sensible
scheme---tables, concept maps, outlines, whatever.
- Creativity: Lastly, even if we observe everything, and
we get it all very organized, we might still be resigning ourselves to the same old
outcomes if we don't dare to do something different with the data we're dealing with.The
three lessons I will outline here may help to better prepare us and our students to think
more effectively.
Precursor #1---Observation:
I start with a brief (10-item) quiz to demonstrate how little
we normally observe. Sample questions: What's on the back of a $1 bill? What's the highest
number on an FM radio dial? What side of a book has the even-numbered pages? Etc. Most
students get about 50% of these correct.
I then give each student an ordinary #2 pencil and ask them
to list as many observations as they can about the pencil. After about 5 minutes, I ask
for responses and list them on the board---actually I fill in a mind map that categorizes
the responses---the categories invariably describe the pencil, talk about what it is made
of, discuss its potential uses, or identify its origins. As an aside to that observation,
when I think of all the essay exams I've written, I feel the questions have almost always
asked me to describe something, talk about its composition, discuss its uses or its
origins. It seems like that's a natural way for students to observe and think.
I've also, on occasion, had a co-worker interrupt the class
for a few minutes. After the co-worker leaves, I ask the students to describe the
co-worker.
On other occasions, I've had a message on the board as
students enter the class. I erase it as class begins and see if anyone noticed---i.e.
"Today's class is not not cancelled."
Lastly, articles and tips about observing and using our
senses are found quite readily in numerous books (especially science texts) and articles.
I briefly discuss and distribute an old Sports Afield magazine article about an
Apache guide who taught a naturalist how to more effectively observe the wilderness.
Students frequently come to subsequent classes commenting on
some of the "really dumb" stuff they had never noticed before. That's a fine
skill to hone on the way to becoming more critical thinkers.
Precursor #2 will follow next week.
